Search for: "Mead v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments [2024] EWHC 898 (Pat) On 23 April 2024, Mr Justice Meade handed down his judgment in the dispute between Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) and Molecular Instruments (MI). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Gilead side vegetables In Gilead v Nucana [2023] EWHC 611 Meade J held that the primary evidence on undue burden will be from the experts. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
 Meade J’s judgment (Neurim Pharmaceutical (1991) Limited and Anor v Generics (UK) Limited t/a Viatris and Anor [2022] EWHC 109 (Pat)), which can be found here, was handed down on 24 January 2022. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 3:59 pm
Here is a link to LtGen Mattis's letter dismissing charges in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Christopher Mathews
It’s 22 degrees at Fort Meade and snowing heavily (for those who find the weather reports fascinating). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
On April 22, the Court heard an extended — over seventy minutes long - argument in Ricci v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:18 am
Illinois Dep't of Revenue, No. 06-1413 In a case raising the issue of whether Illinois constitutionally taxed an apportioned share of the capital gain realized by Mead, an out-of-state corporation, on the sale of one of its business divisions, Lexis/Nexis, a judgment in the state's favor is vacated and remanded where: 1) the state courts erred in considering whether Lexis/Nexis served an "operational purpose" in Mead's business… [read post]
The Court’s approach to confidentiality Meade J began his analysis with a reminder of the key principles identified by the Court of Appeal in OnePlus v Mitsubishi ([2020] EWCA 1562). [read post]