Search for: "National Advertising Co. v. STATE, ETC."
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
(Aside for non-lawyers: “diverse” = plaintiff and defendants are citizens of different states; “non-diverse” = citizens of same state on both sides of the “v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
This law as amended was the copyright law of the United States from July 1, 1909 through December 31, 1977. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for… [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Mike Grynberg: we care most about trade dress, it seems, as well as problems of the multifactor test etc. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
" A barrier to the NAACP's argument for anonymous speech rights was Lewis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Under Miranda v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Blistex, Ciba, Pfizer, 3M, Edgecraft, Darex, Cisco, Bunn-O-Matic, Oreck, Novartis, Merck, etc. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Blistex, Ciba, Pfizer, 3M, Edgecraft, Darex, Cisco, Bunn-O-Matic, Oreck, Novartis, Merck, etc. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Additionally, this tally pertains only to books (as opposed to separately printed reports, opinions, articles, etc.) published during the Justices’ lifetimes. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
This Hong Kong visit was before Apple triumphed with the iPod, iPad, etc., so now add those goodies to the list. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
By analogy, counsel was arguing for the creation for copyright law of something like New York Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
Zauderer involved attorney advertising that told laypeople that if the lawyer lost their case, there’d be no fee. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
Circuit’s subsequent decision in Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline) US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
ANTI-GUNS-ON-CAMPUS BLOWBACK: You know, I raised this issue with a Faculty Senate colleague and was…
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
What these signs actually do is create (and advertise!) [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
The idea can be traced to the 1978 case of First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
