Search for: "Nicole Saharsky"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 7:45 am
” When Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky insisted that was true, Justice Scalia remarked “I’ll have to look it up. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
Nicole Saharsky, arguing amicus for the Government, said that the Fifth Circuit erred in requiring proof of loss causation at class certification for three reasons: First, it's conducting a merits inquiry that's not tethered to the Rule 23 requirements; second, it's taking a presumption and requiring plaintiffs to prove it; and third, it's confusing the distinct elements of reliance and loss causation. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Several Assistants to the Solicitor General appeared three times: Curtis Gannon, Eric Miller, Nicole Saharsky, and Anthony Yang. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:05 am
The morning was not particularly eventful during the arguments of David Frederick (for the employee Tibble) and Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky (for the federal government supporting Tibble). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
Again, talking with Nicole Saharsky, who represented the creditors, Roberts acknowledged that the “safe-harbor” rule he supported would “have some chilling effect on creditors, and it doesn’t surprise me that creditors don’t like that. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:06 pm
Solicitor General, Nicole A. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit held oral arguments on March 4, 2024 in the important patent case of Celanese Int’l. v ITC, 22-1827 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky effectively attempted to distinguish Richardson into oblivion. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
Phillips spoke, Nicole A. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
Phillips spoke, Nicole A. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:35 am
Despite statements by assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky that the federal government occupied some middle ground between the positions taken by Omnicare and the pension fund, and from Omnicare that no one really agreed with the position taken by the Sixth Circuit, the Court seemed largely to think that the Sixth Circuit got it mostly right. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:17 am
Lawyers from the Office of the Solicitor General constitute the largest part of this elite tier: Solicitor General Donald Verrilli himself has argued four cases, while Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben and Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky have each argued three cases. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 10:58 am
Three attorneys have six arguments apiece: Nicole Saharsky and Ian Gershengorn (also a former SG) both argued cases for the government, while Jeffrey Fisher has the most arguments for an attorney who did not argue cases for the federal government during the time period of this case set. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:54 pm
Saharsky, an Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
Saharsky, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:18 pm
., sharing time with Nicole A. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
Saharsky, an assistant to the U.S. [read post]
