Search for: "Owings v. Speed" Results 41 - 60 of 327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 11:49 am
The SFIO has been charged with the task of investigating the fraud at Satyam within a period of three months.In his article in the latest issue of Frontline, V. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am by Peter Mahler
Under the case law, common-law dissolution requires the minority shareholder to show, as articulated by the Court of Appeals in Leibert v Clapp, that “the directors and majority shareholders . . . so palpably breached the fiduciary duty they owe to the minority shareholders that they are disqualified from exercising the exclusive discretion and the dissolution power given to them by statute. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
A dynamic entry uses speed and surprise to gain an advantage before occupants have time to access weapons, destroy evidence, or resist the police. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
A dynamic entry uses speed and surprise to gain an advantage before occupants have time to access weapons, destroy evidence, or resist the police. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 6:02 pm by Joe Mullin
An eight-person jury was picked yesterday, and today the Apple v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Now repeat after me 15 times, at speed: “She sells shrimp shipping from the seashore”.2. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:02 pm by Kyle Graham
 The delay owes to the fact that but-for causation is doubly shielded from appellate review. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 11:20 am
A rare decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia has shed light on the extent to which police owe a duty of care to road users during pursuits.In Bergen v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Jeremy
Following six years of inconclusive meetings and correspondence, HP sought a declaration that no remuneration was owed for the printers which it had offered for sale or that, if such remuneration was owed, the remuneration which it had already paid corresponded to the fair compensation owed under the Belgian legislation, interpreted in the light of Directive 2001/29. [read post]