Search for: "Padilla v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 10:02 am
United States, on the retroactivity of Padilla v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:53 am
State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 11:31 pm
Bush and Hamdi v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:24 pm
The docket for State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v Kentucky opened the door for an argument that I have always supported-a criminal defense lawyer needs to inform a non-citizen client of the possible immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:07 pm
At oral argument in Padilla v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:37 am
The court analyzed the Padilla retroactivity issue solely under Florida state law. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
On March 31, 2010 the US Supreme Court handed down a 7-2 decision in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
United States and it involves the issue of Padilla retroactivity. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has held in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 8:29 am
United States, Case No. 10-CV-1885 (N.D. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:30 am
State, that said that it is indisputable that Padilla is not retroactive, meaning, that any cases that are final cannot be challenged under grounds explained in Padilla because Padilla is a new rule. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:14 am
KJ Related articles Rosenberg on Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 2:21 pm
In arguing for relief, the defendants in both these cases relied on Padilla v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
United States, 568 U.S. __ (Feb. 20, 2013), holding that Padilla v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm
Chaidez held that the Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
The case is Delgado-Ramos v. [read post]
