Search for: "People v. Hurley" Results 41 - 60 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Eugene Volokh] The Lack of a Sufficient "Common Theme" on the Large Social Media Platforms
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
" As a result, we held [in Hurley v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] The First Amendment and Treating Social Media Platforms as Common Carriers
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Social Media Platforms as Common Carriers?
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
National Federation of the Blind; Hurley v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Florida Social Media Censorship Law ENJOINED–NetChoice v. Moody
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
In other words, people who try to cloak censorial regulations as pro-free speech are actually trampling on the Constitution. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Amicus Briefs Against Florida’s Censorship Law (SB 7072)
16 Jun 2021, 8:01 am by Eric Goldman
The Florida legislature could not overturn Miami Herald or Hurley simply by declaring that newspapers or parades are “common carriers. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Being able and available when disabled: getting worse in the weekly certifications
8 Jun 2021, 10:41 am by vforberger
Lascaris, 499 F.Supp. 749, 759–60 (N.D.N.Y. 1980) (enjoining reduction in food stamp allowances); Hurley v. [read post]
Wisconsin Unemployment - https://wisconsinui.wordpress.com/
Justice Thomas's Misguided Concurrence on Platform Regulation
14 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Berin Szóka, Corbin Barthold
In fact, in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
“Supreme Court Seems Ready to Back Payments to Student-Athletes; But the justices voiced concern that challenges to N.C.A.A. limits on pay beyond the modest education-related sums at issue in the case could threaten the distinction between amateur and pro sports”
31 Mar 2021, 6:26 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court oral argument in National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
“Supreme Court Weighs Limits of ‘Hot Pursuit’ by Police; The court has said that the police need no warrants to enter the homes of fleeing felons; Does that exception also apply to people suspected of minor crimes?”
24 Feb 2021, 4:35 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court oral argument in Lange v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Argument analysis: ACA seems likely to survive, but on what ground?
10 Nov 2020, 2:54 pm by Amy Howe
In 2012, a divided court upheld the mandate in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Symposium: The individual plaintiffs in California v. Texas suffer a greater Article III injury than did the individual plaintiffs in NFIB v. Sebelius
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm by Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro
The individual plaintiffs in California v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Case preview: Justices will consider constitutionality of ACA’s individual mandate again
4 Nov 2020, 1:27 pm by Amy Howe
” In NFIB v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
If the Challengers Prevail on the Merits of the ACA California v. Texas Case, What is the Appropriate Remedy and What Effect Should the Ruling Have on the Entirety of the ACA? Part Four in a Series
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar, Evan Caminker and Jason Mazzone
Assume that in California v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Josh Blackman] President Trump's Executive Order on An America-First Healthcare Plan
24 Sep 2020, 4:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Hurley and Nantz are not eligible for subsidies. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Court Rejects Constitutional Challenge to Critical Teaching About Islamic Terrorism
18 Aug 2020, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Lemon v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Trump Teases Further on Executive Order on Pre-Existing Conditions: It's a "Double Safety Net" and a "Second Platform."
10 Aug 2020, 9:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Hurley and Nantz are not eligible for subsidies. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Trump Teases Executive Order On Pre-Existing Protections, I Suspect, To Help With ACA Litigation
7 Aug 2020, 10:04 pm by Josh Blackman
[The Cato Institute's amicus brief in California v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Thursday round-up
21 May 2020, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Ask the author: Reuters on the consequences of qualified immunity for police officers
15 May 2020, 10:11 am by Katie Bart
In 2009, in Pearson v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[David Bernstein] Can Courts Distinguish Anti-BDS Laws from Public Accomodations Laws for First Amendment Purposes?
11 May 2020, 10:06 am by David Bernstein
" United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/