Search for: "People v. Jackson (1985)" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2012, 6:24 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Jackson, 167 Cal.App.3d 829, 832, 213 Cal.Rptr. 521, 522 (1985) (sustained dating relationship between defense counsel and prosecutor constituted conflict requiring reversal of conviction); Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 1985) (threats to publicize the identities of pornography buyers were constitutionally protected). [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Arguably when judges use their position to solicit contributions they misuse the judicial office and may cause people to feel intimidated or coerced into donating.[118] Judges might take advantage of the prestige of their office to solicit money for an organization, and this may occur even in circumstances where such conduct cannot be described as involving intimidation.[119] The prestige of the judicial office is not intended to be used as a vehicle to advance economic, financial, social,… [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
As I noted on Tuesday, Adis Medunjanin was convicted this week in connection with the NYC subway bombing plot. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
You know that, and you don't want people to get hurt while time's a wasting. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
This attack comes at a time when the world needs every agricultural tool available to meet the needs of a growing population, expected to reach 9 billion people by 2050. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]