Search for: "People v. Moreno"
Results 41 - 60
of 254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm
From Pinter-Brown v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
And in those opinions, the Court of Appeal not only expressly mentions Fallon Flores' name, and not only expressly mention the name of the victim (Fernando Renteria), but also give a fair piece of detail about that victim (calling him "a small-time drug user and distributor in the Moreno Valley area of Riverside County").It wouldn't bother me if we called every crime victim a Doe (though I think that using their actual names somewhat personalizes the crime and… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
a gay rights doctrine (even though, as Carpenter points out, there are predecessors in United States v Moreno and Cleburne). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:09 am
Moreno v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am
In Gersh v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 3:02 pm
Moreno v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
" Rubin v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
"The decision is set out below:The People of the State of New York, ex rel. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
ACLU v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
Moreno, a petite brunette with large luminous brown eyes and tapered nails painted bright sapling-green. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:57 am
Roberts explicitly overrules Korematsu and says that any comparison to Trump v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:09 am
Moreno of the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:26 am
I mean, they really worked to screw it up.Fast forward a few years and we get to People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 6:19 am
As I tell my Internet Law students when we cover the Moreno v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
“The court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew their recusal motion (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]; People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618-619 [2013]; Mehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 140 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2016]; CPLR 2221[e]). [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 10:23 am
The New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department affirmed the denial of a motion to recuse The court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiffs' motion for leave to renew their recusal motion (see People v Moreno, 70... [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:54 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
