Search for: "People v. Pierre" Results 41 - 60 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am by admin
This West Chester lawmaker invited her testimony, chair says,” Ohio Capital Journal (July 14, 2021). [2] The Disinformation Dozen (2021), [3] Shaw v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, this Court’s power is as broad as that of the trial court, and this Court may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that, in a close case, the trial court had the advantage of seeing and hearing [*3]the witnesses” (US Bank N.A. v Pierre, 189 AD3d 1309, 1310 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of… [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Then the action has shifted to the rulemaking b/c of all these adversely affected people. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 2:13 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
TIFFANY CRUNCH N CREAM (cl. 30): Spaniards and French people do not understand „crunch“ T-773/22, 25/10/23 – v. , cl. 25: LOC T-516/22, 11/10/23 – BLUE v. . [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
 Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:37 am by Susan Brenner
Approximately two years ago, Defendants Pierre A. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
… Canadian Class Actions MonitorComments on Bernard v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm by admin
 Sounds a little like Eliot Ness v. spam … Compliance: “If you abide by the law you have nothing to fear. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm by Rev. Dr. Cari Jackson
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]