Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 6:33 am
The question at issue in Kwikset v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm
The superior court permitted the People to withdraw a pending petition for revocation of parole that CDCR filed against Escobedo, who was on lifetime parole when he committed his offense. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
I was contacted by a few people who were interested in attending the appellate hearing in Betancourt v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:21 am
And I don't at all expect perfection from opinions by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court -- in this case, from Yolo County.But, as a general matter, there's no reason to include stuff in a published opinion that's unnecessary as well as routine. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
So the trial court lets him go.The Court of Appeal reverses.Nope. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:44 pm
Defendant relied on Pantos v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(See People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:58 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:53 am
In the recent case of Hoekstra v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Superior Court (Lee) (10/15/14) --- Cal.App.4th --- addresses these issues. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 6:54 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 12:04 pm
Mohen v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
As an initial matter, the Court of Appeal explained that under People ex rel. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:44 am
I am delighted to report that on January 21, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an en banc decision in M.A.T. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:44 am
I am delighted to report that on January 21, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an en banc decision in M.A.T. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:33 pm
Unlike actual medical records, which are legitimately private.So holds the California Court of Appeal. [read post]