Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 3,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
(Quiet Title Act; Administrative Procedure Act) Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:58 am by Mark Ashton
This problem is a piece of the March 26 ruling by the Superior Court in O’Patchen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Mark Ashton
The Superior Court denied the request but ordered the trial court to review the matter. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
He thought he had superior hard power, but underestimated Western unity and sanctions and relied too heavily on conscripts. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Those people will receive sentences from the district court that commits them to the custody of the commissioner of corrections. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
They go by various names—Freedom of Information, Right-to-Know, Open Records, or even Sunshine laws—but all share the general concept that because the government is of the people, its documents belong to the people. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm by Samah Rahman
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm by Mark Ashton
  Superior Court of NJ, Appellate Division  A-1543-22 (3/1/24) (nonprecedential) [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:12 pm by Earl Drott
While there are grounds for vacating unfavorable verdicts in car accident cases, courts do not grant such requests lightly, as demonstrated in a recent Texas case, Mark Mandel v. [read post]