Search for: "People v. White" Results 41 - 60 of 5,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Gregory Ablavsky
  First, he notes what should have been obvious but is often overlooked: white settlers were not the only people with settled expectations. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:52 pm by Donna Bader
In recent rulings, the Supreme Court filed several decisions that will make some people angry and others happy: In Trump v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Author Gary Arlen
  “When violence breaks out at what was a peaceful protest, the people involved may or may not be the same ones. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  People who objected when Pete Rose was banned from the Baseball Hall of Fame were apoplectic because, they pointed out, he had the most hits in baseball history (a history that included more than a half-century in which only white men could play, but never mind).But keeping someone out of the Hall of Fame does not say that he did not get those hits. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Surrounded by very intelligent people, I have always learned something I needed to know. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am by JB
We can say that although most lawyers in 1868 continued to justify white supremacy, a small number of brave people did not. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:31 pm by Michele Goodwin
 In the wake of both Whole Woman’s Health and June Medical Services v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
People in prayer outside boards of election that wouldn’t let them register. 14-year- old Emmet Til killed on a visit to Mississippi relatives, accused of whistling at a white woman. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm by David Super
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]