Search for: "People v Flowers"
Results 41 - 60
of 328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2006, 1:13 pm
• 4 flowers in each box (flowers weren't always in the same pattern)• 100 total flowers in red boxes• 84 little white boxes on ceiling• 40 long white flowers in 20 blue boxes on ceiling• Blue squares w/ flowers in each of 4 corners• 6 lights in blue boxes on ceiling• 30 little blue boxes with white flowers (not… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
Flowers, the Court clarified that people are eligible for relief under the First Step Act even if their Guidelines remain unchanged. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:32 am
The case of Joshua Martin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
" People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Justice Kavanaugh announces opinion in Flowers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
How many people do you think would know the difference? [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Black people are resilient — we’ve created so much already. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
The case of Flowers v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 8:44 am
–Gifford v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:36 am
I refer to a classic contract law case, Odorizzi v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
Buy yourself some flowers - you deserve them! [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:25 pm
From United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Robert then tackled Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, in which the CJEU viewed the impression of the average internet user as being an essential element of the test of whether the use of another's brand as a keyword conveys an impression that the use of that brand suggests that the user's business is connected with that of the brand owner. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:46 am
” At Law.com, David Ogden weighs in on Flowers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
It's dark and not many people are out and about yet. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am
The obvious difference lies in the text: whilst Chanel has ‘N°5, CHANEL’, the alleged infringing product uses ‘N°9, FLOWER OF STORY’ (hereinafter ‘the N°9 perfume’). [read post]
