Search for: "People v. Acuff" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
"The amici cited Judge Leval's citation in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, stating that"the goals of the copyright law...are not always best served by automatically granting injunctive relief when parodists [and presumably commentators] are found to have gone beyond the bounds of fair use. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Rachel Sandler
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 [4] CCA & B, LLC., v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
When the Supreme Court re-calibrated the fair use analysis to focus on transformativeness in Campbell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
This post takes up the questions of how copyright law may impact the development and commercialization of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, given their use of other people's data, generally without prior notice or permission. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  For people on both sides of the class action bar, denial in these two cases represents a big missed opportunity to provide additional clarity on recurring issues. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
  Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am by Cory Doctorow
In the decades since the Acuff-Rose sampling decision came down in 1994, musicians around the world have treated its contours as a best practice in their own sampling. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 7:41 am by Andrei Mincov
Recently I wrote a 100-page comparative research paper on the treatment of parody in the copyright laws of common law countries and selected European countries. [read post]