Search for: "People v. Ball"
Results 41 - 60
of 988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
It ignored the mental health needs of people in ADCRR, spraying them with pepper spray or shooting them with pepper ball guns instead of providing treatment. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
Is it "highly probable" that you're going to pick a blue ball? [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
However, a forward lateral moves the ball forward in such a way that it is against the rules. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:04 am
Since the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:49 am
With these three balls you’ve got to lower three pins off a pedestal. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:58 pm
However, as the case of Summer J. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:02 pm
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:40 am
Sure, the market is more volatile, but that’s a risk most people are willing to take. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 10:03 am
Not many people are willing and able to do that. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
Here's a great case decided by the California Cout of Appeal earlier today that encapsulates both a variety of policy/doctrinal choices as well as exemplifies how not-so-easy being a judge is even you're in fact a "pure umpire" who's merely "calling balls and strikes. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
Just callin balls and strikes, yup. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
Here's another case -- and there are assuredly many -- that in my mind clearly disproves our Chief Justice's assertion that appellate judges properly merely "call balls and strikes. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:01 pm
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:46 am
In the case, Fridman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:35 pm
The very first Supreme Court victory for LGBT people came about during this period when the court ruled in One, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
Ball, professor at the Rutgers University School of Law (Newark). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
Its dynamic allows two people to find a life that could not be found alone, for a marriage becomes greater than just the two persons. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
For example, the U.S. argued, this rule might make it more difficult to deport people who had been convicted of illegal possession of firearms. [read post]
