Search for: "People v. Bell (1998)" Results 41 - 60 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The 3rd Circuit reversed, and in Florence v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
In or around 1998, one of us collaborated with Justice Frank Iacobucci of the Supreme Court of Canada to present materials on rights for gay people for a conference of judges from all around the world. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In light of the industry’s history of deception, though, the government had shown a significant problem of misleading ads and marketing tactics, which had, for example, raised the market share of “low tar” cigarettes—which are no better for health—from 2% in 1967 to 81.9% in 1998. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Phoenix, 154 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 1998) (applying void-for-vagueness analysis in a nonpublic forum); Miller v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Bell was not entirely correct As many of you know, I think that Buck v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:39 am by pgbarnes
Supreme Court decisions (Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Public Interest Defense The law of confidentiality is based on the principle that people who are entrusted with confidential information ought, as a general rule, to respect it. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases… [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
Death Sentences: Hector Acosta In November 2019, a Tarrant County jury sentenced Hector Acosta to death for killing two people in Arlington in 2017, beheading one of the victims and mutilating their bodies with a machete and a two-by-four. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]