Search for: "People v. Brady"
Results 41 - 60
of 596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2015, 10:19 am
Brady v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 10:44 am
People who follow the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:53 am
Because if he's right that people are different, then maybe this case can't be a class action. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
In Brady v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
Suffice it to say, prosecutors are playing games with people’s lives all the time. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:30 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
But there are definitely patterns.But then, once in while, the Court of Appeal publishes an opinion that mixes things up a bit.So today's published opinion begins:"After defendant Brady Dee Douglas’s former boyfriend, a male prostitute, told him Jeffrey B. had shorted him money following a prearranged sexual encounter, defendant and codefendant Clifton Sharpe tracked down Jeffrey and demanded the unpaid money. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:25 am
“We rely on them totally,” Presiding Judge Sharon Keller said about the CCA’s staff attorneys.Shannon Edmonds at the Texas District and County Attorneys Association provided this rueful addendum about legislators questioning of Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Barbara Hervey over training for prosecutors on handing over exculpatory evidence, which the US Supreme Court deemed a constitutional obligation under Brady v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
In the English case, Brady v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm
People v Singh ruled that evidence of which a defendant has knowledge, or should reasonably have known of, is not Brady material. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Prosecutors said they had no constitutional duty under Brady v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 5:02 pm
See Brady v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
Osborne (08-6), an implied question is whether an inmate has a right under the Fourteenth Amendment, after conviction, to seek that type of evidence when the right is based upon the Supreme Court's 1963 ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
In sum, the term refers to the Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
In sum, the term refers to the Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:09 am
We call it "Brady material" after the Supreme Court's 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 11:59 am
Somebody from the back cried out,"Have you ever heard of Brady v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
Thompson begins at the link; more on Brady v. [read post]
