Search for: "People v. Henning"
Results 41 - 60
of 439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
[A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:55 am
People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
" And I thought you'd enjoy the diversion.Here's an instrumental version with an excellent collection of photographs of less famous people — presumably centering on the 1920s and showing many women dressed as men and men as women (or, perhaps, transgender men and women):Here are the full lyrics, written by Edgar Leslie/James V. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
STATE V. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
In Tandon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
He tries to reassure those people that they `are not in trouble’ and that, even though medical treatment is expensive, their immediate health is more important than the cost. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Over the following decades theSupreme Court continued to recognize the importance of the right to counsel,ultimately concluding in 1984 in Strickland v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 12:20 pm
” The court continued, “[W]hen we studied 15 cases and it looks very much like there’s redundant billing of eight different people who are absolutely helpless [and/or] incompetent, that one phone call seems to have been made that two-tenths of an hour and eight different people got charged for it, if that’s not what happened I really am going to want to know. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:30 am
United States, and Yates v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 11:09 am
Link: People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
At his retirement in 1952, Chief Justice John Latham (himself a deeply conservative figure and former Opposition Leader) declared (in light of the trouble and controversy that the section had caused lawyers and judges alike) that '[w]hen I die, s. 92 will be found written on my heart': (1952) 85 CLR ix. [read post]
