Search for: "People v. House (1970)" Results 41 - 60 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The 1999 guidance then in force, given under s.7 Local Authority Social Services Act 1970, stated: A number of the children and young people who fall within the remit of YOTs will also be children in need, including some whose needs will include safeguarding. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:00 pm by Eric Biber
  Instead, it was the Congress of the 1970s that wrote a broad statute – and the Supreme Court of 2006 that interpreted that statute to (more or less) require EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles (Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
Toppi told Brennan to take him to his mother's house in Cambridge, which Brennan did. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
The fact that a consultation was in favour of the charging scheme or that most people believe that fixed charges are cheaper than metered supply does not amount to a presumption of fairness. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
The fact that a consultation was in favour of the charging scheme or that most people believe that fixed charges are cheaper than metered supply does not amount to a presumption of fairness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:26 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionJamal GreeneBruce Ackerman’s We the People series is self-consciously about canon formation. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many people are saying we need a new Court, with proposals for significant reforms such as term limits and court expansion gaining much more mainstream support than imagined twenty years ago (even after Bush v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm by Stephen Griffin
  Some people think the House could have won more help from the courts, but this was pure speculation. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
” In its place, the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity published a final rule limiting federal oversight of local housing programs. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
 I never said a word about 1970s and 1980s pop culture, even though it is made to appear that I did (to the exclusion of actual evidence, of course). [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am by NCC Staff
Current President Donald Trump is now part of the case, called Smith v. [read post]