Search for: "People v. Hughes (2002)" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Her parents, respondents Hugh and Barbara Cassidy, inherited the rights to Eva’s work. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Her parents, respondents Hugh and Barbara Cassidy, inherited the rights to Eva’s work. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Doyal, Chief Justice Hughes spoke as follows respecting the copyright monopoly granted by Congress, ‘The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[xxiv] More than 11,000 people contributed over $150 million to the organization. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  To add to these difficulties, people are living longer, which means they need their retirement income to last longer. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am by Michael Geist
First, a unanimous court in the song previews reset the law with an emphasis once again on balance and user rights: In Theberge v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Law publishing industry veteran and innovator, Jason Wilson has been pondering on relevant matters as the case of ROSS v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL [read post]