Search for: "People v. Mills"
Results 41 - 60
of 790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
I'm entirely confident that most people who have pleaded guilty will in fact not be able to successfully petition for factual innocence. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
"The best thing I can do is help people realize there's a change that's needed to prevent this from happening again. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:14 pm
On first glance, after reading today's opinion by Division Six of the Second District, it seemed like a run-of-the-mill split in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:31 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:15 am
Although the Human Rights Law is silent as to the manner and effective date of commencing an appeal from a determination by the Commissioner of Human Rights (or a DHR regional director), the Appellate Division noted the "considerable body of precedential law" in support of its ruling, citing People v Dimmie, 15 NY2d 578. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
There's not much of a constituency for the select group of people who kill someone and then burn down their house. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
Take Our PollCategory 3 — People and Parties #1 Hon. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Catherine’s Milling and Lumber Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:05 am
In Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
And Judge VanDyke expresses this belief in his opinion three separate times; it's not inadvertent.My own experience is that (1) people commonly use the term "evangelical Christian" to mean something very specific and different from just your run-of-the-mill Christian, and (2) most -- or at least, many -- people of the Christian faith do not, in fact, actively seek to proselytize and convert people to the faith.Now, I grew up in Virginia,… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:10 am
Bay Mills Indian Community Not as many, and most are less scary. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
First, on June 5, 2009 in People v Joseph (63 AD3d 1658 [June 5, 2009]), then on June 12, 2009, in People v Mills (63 AD3d 1717 [June 12, 2009]) and, again on July 10, 2009 in People v Reome (2009 NY Slip Op 05804 [July 10, 2009]).Since 1995 there have been more than 1500 such decisions statewide. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:51 am
After 2005’s Cleveland Bar Association v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:19 pm
Department of the Interior (Fee-to-Trust; IGRA)Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Catherine’s Milling and Lumber Company v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:48 pm
I just listened to the State of Maine v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
As far as you could tell from the opinion, this is a run-of-the-mill case that just so happens to involve one of the many anonymous people in this world called Orenthal James Simpson.Anyway, on the merits, Justice Willhite is clearly and unambiguously right that California has personal jurisdiction to renew a money judgment as an extension of the original jurisdiction over the tort. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 10:02 am
(Linda Rosenthal, For Purpose Law Group) Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
” In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
Mill (leaving aside the ‘other’ Mill of the East India Co. or the Irish Famine[2]) argued that “the key feature of representative government is that it evaluates all governmental proposals and decisions and ensures that both the people’s decisions and political decisions, get public visibility” [emphasis added]. [read post]
