Search for: "People v. Thompson (2000)" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000); and 2) even assuming that the de minimis standard is appropriate, the government failed to show that his activity had such an effect on interstate commerce. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Mukasey, No. 072311 In an immigration matter in which petitioner was charged by Department of Homeland Security with removability as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony after admission, removal order is vacated where: 1) informal agreement between petitioner's parents to share legal custody was entitled to effect; and 2) Child Citizenship Act of 2000 requirement that, at the time the statute went into effect, petitioner was "in the legal...custody of the citizen… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Studies using polygraph examinations to elicit disclosures have found that sex offenders have often committed sex crimes that went undisclosed and were never reported to police or child protection agencies (Ahlmeyer, Heil, McKee, & English, 2000; English, Jones, Pasini-Hill, Patrick, & Cooley-Towell, 2000; Heil, Ahlmeyer, & Simons, 2003). [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
To avoid an adverse ruling on the First Amendment in 2000, see Washington Legal Foundation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]