Search for: "Perry v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
However, where the issue of the superior right of possession can be determined separately from title issues, the justice court has jurisdiction to decide the case. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Leach Builders, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm
As you, the reader of a legal blog, undoubtedly know, earlier today Judge Walker released his opinion in Perry v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 9:33 am
City of Perris v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:08 pm
In line with our superior court’s reasoning in Humphries, we must conclude that appellant suffered prejudice and will take appropriate action in our decretal paragraph. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:32 pm
Cal Supreme Court will answer in City of Perris v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In December, the Court granted review in Fischer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:24 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Perry, the Proposition 8 Case). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:31 pm
Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:01 am
Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Supreme Court majority in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
MD v Perry (5th Cir 2012). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Texas Supreme Court justices will entertain oral argument on the issue when they convene out of town -- in Houston -- tomorrow.The case is styled Hiawatha Henry, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
V. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Because the majority concluded that the lower court acted in haste, and neglected federal law, and because the Court is not subject to Federal Judicial Conference rules, the Court’s decision blocking broadcasts in Perry v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:56 pm
He was exercising a Superior Court judge’s jurisdiction to control the court’s processes and nothing more. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:22 pm
For example, in Perry v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:53 pm
Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689, contending that it owed no duty of care to the plaintiff. [read post]
