Search for: "Peter Margulies" Results 41 - 60 of 373
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2020, 8:30 am by Ilya Somin
Here are videos of recent online talks I gave about my book Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration and Political Freedom for the Cato Institute (with commentary by economist Bryan Caplan and immigration law scholar Peter Margulies), and the University of Torcuato Di Tella law faculty Seminar on Law, Economics, and Regulation (Argentina). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 12:08 am by Immigration Prof
The DACA Decision and Requiring Agencies to Turn 'Square Corners': Reading Reliance Interests into Immigration Law by Peter Margulies, Cato Supreme Court Review 2019-2020 (Forthcoming) Abstract In holding that the Trump administration's rescission of President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood... [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
There will be commentary by economist Bryan Caplan and immigration law scholar Peter Margulies, who recently reviewed the book at the Lawfare website. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 8:28 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Peter Margulies praised Ilya Somin’s new book, “Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom,” for its libertarian defense of “open borders. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:43 pm by Matt Gluck
Peter Margulies commended Ilya Somin’s new book, “Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom,” for its insightful libertarian justification of an “open border” policy. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:59 am by Immigration Prof
Peter Margulies on Lawfare reviews Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom by Ilya Somin (Cato Institute Book, Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Peter Margulies discussed a Ninth Circuit ruling against the third country asylum rule. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:09 pm by Matt Gluck
Peter Margulies explained the Ninth Circuit’s ruling on the Third Country Rule, which denies asylum to individuals who cross the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 10:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Schwarzman senior fellow for Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, about her new book "Shields of the Republic": Peter Margulies argued that the Supreme Court’s Thursday decision to uphold DACA may be subject to rescission in the future, and will likely be left up to the 2020 election. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm by Matt Gluck
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s Thursday ruling rejecting the Trump administrations attempt to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:35 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Another perspective on this case worth highlighting comes from Professor Peter Margulies. [read post]
9 May 2020, 8:31 am by Elliot Setzer
Peter Margulies summarized a Ninth Circuit ruling denying the government’s request for a stay of a nationwide preliminary injunction against a presidential proclamation barring admission of immigrants without “approved” health insurance. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:32 am by Elliot Setzer
Peter Margulies summarized a Ninth Circuit ruling denying the government’s request for a stay of a nationwide preliminary injunction against a presidential proclamation barring admission of immigrants without “approved” health insurance. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 8:41 am by Elliot Setzer
Peter Margulies argued that Trump’s coronavirus immigration order is a restriction in search of a rationale. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:27 am by Elliot Setzer
Peter Margulies argued that Trump’s coronavirus immigration order is a restriction in search of a rationale. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 8:41 am by Elliot Setzer
Max Margulies argued that the National Commission on Public Service is right to recommend mandatory draft registration for women. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am by Elliot Setzer
Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast featuring a discussion of recent developments in African politics with Judd Devermont and Emilia Columbo: Peter Margulies analyzed a Ninth Circuit decision which cast doubt on the legality both of the “Remain in Mexico” program and of a rule limiting access to asylum. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:24 am by Elliot Setzer
Peter Margulies analyzed a Ninth Circuit decision which cast doubt on the legality both of the “Remain in Mexico” program and of a rule limiting access to asylum. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
When, if ever, must the federal court door be open to an asylum-seeker facing expedited removal who claims that the government violated his statutory, regulatory and constitutional rights? [read post]