Search for: "Power v. California Bank" Results 41 - 60 of 792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 5:47 pm
Here's the abstract: Due to the legislative power of the banking industry, the U.S. federal government has been more reluctant to place limits on bank fees and charges than the European Union (E.U.). [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:54 am by Jeff Schmitt
Justice Marshall explained that, because “the power to tax involves the power to destroy,” the state tax unconstitutionally interfered with the Bank of the US. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
MishkinIt looks like the court is finally set to rule on the CFPB’s motion to dismiss in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:54 am by Venkat
CVS Caremark Men's Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute -- Boorstein v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
Kidde, 2014 WL 703514 (California Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 1:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  In its second noteworthy action during Wednesday's conference, the California Supreme Court granted a request to publish an August 2013 opinion from the Appellate Division of the Santa Clara County Superior Court in The Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:15 pm
In this article, my partner, Ben Young, explains why a recent opinion from the California Fourth District Court of Appeal missed the point and why ABCs remain a powerful tool available to get the bank paid. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
  Well if you didn’t read it… it’s sure should pack a powerful message about your collective future. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm by WIMS
      In 2009, California passed Assembly Bill 1318, which requires the District to transfer credits to a soon-to-be completed power plant named Sentinel. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, in October 2014, a judge in the Central District of California found the exclusion to be ambiguous based on a similar reason (among other considerations). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
”  The Court of Appeal reasoned that because the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]