Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2012, 4:56 pm
The claims asserted against KBR and First Kuwaiti in the United States’ complaint are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.The lawsuit was filed in the Central District of Illinois and is captioned United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am
The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
United States, 509 U.S. 602 (1993). [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 5:17 pm
In Mascareignes Sterling Co Ltd v Chang Cheng Esquares Co Ltd (Mauritius), the Privy Council of the United Kingdom recently set out some helpful principles to define the entitlement of a contractor to extra payment under a fixed price contract. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
United States, 462 F. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:53 am
The index, which tracks repeat sales of existing homes and does not include condos, showed average home prices across the United States are back to the levels they were at in 2003. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:05 pm
The appellate court relied upon the United States Supreme Court decision of Rucklehaus v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
The post Citizens raises Cain in political speech (Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Price v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day United Company Rusal, plc v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:47 pm
United States District Court Judge Ronald M. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:14 pm
In IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Garbe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) today ruled in Horne v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
United States District Court Judge Susan Illston (Northern District of California) certified a class of indirect purchasers harmed by an alleged global price-fixing conspiracy in the market for Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Display (“TFT-LCD”) panels. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:10 pm
The Minn-Chem court disagreed with the approach of the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm
In addition, the defendants’ price-fixing did not have an effect on prices charged in the United States that could give rise to an antitrust claim. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
