Search for: "Rather v. City & County of San Francisco" Results 41 - 60 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a short but significant published opinion filed July 19, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the San Francisco County Superior Court’s judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of demurrers (without leave to amend) to a CEQA action as time-barred. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Glendening, 709 A.2d 1230 (Md. 1988) and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
In a sweeping ruling reminiscent of trial court decisions from Washington State, San Francisco, New York City and Baltimore that have been issued in recent years, Robert B. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
In a sweeping ruling reminiscent of trial court decisions from Washington State, San Francisco, New York City and Baltimore that have been issued in recent years, Robert B. [read post]
31 May 2020, 9:56 am by Steve Kalar
City & County of San Francisco, 29 F.3d 1355 (9th Cir. 1994)], holding that [the Sheriff’s] execution of the warrant was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment because [the Sheriff’s] primary purpose in executing the warrant was to gather evidence in support of its criminal investigation rather than to assist the inspectors. . . . [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The case – Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
City & County of San Francisco, (2019) ___ Cal.App. 5th ____ In 2014, real parties Forest City California Residential Development and Hearst Communications, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2014, 3:26 pm by Jennifer Lynch
City & County of San Francisco, a civil rights lawsuit that calls into question whether technology alone can provide the basis for reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 329-330 (my April 5, 2019 post on which can be found here) in setting out the general CEQA principles and standards governing its review in a case challenging an EIR’s content and analysis. [read post]