Search for: "Rick Pildes" Results 41 - 60 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes observes that “[d]eciding to hear the Maryland case is a significant signal that a majority of the Court is not going to hold partisan gerrymandering claims to be non-justiciable (that is, inappropriate for judicial resolution)” in the first partisan-gerrymandering case this term, Gill v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am by Garrett Hinck
Rick Pildes proposed a slightly modified approach to protecting the Special Counsel that would allow judicial review of existing Department of Justice regulations. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am by Garrett Hinck
Rick Pildes outlined the options for congressional lawmakers who want to protect the Mueller investigation by law. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 3:27 am by Alex Potcovaru
Bob Bauer responded with some doubt to Rick Pildes’ August 3 argument that a judicially enforceable codification of regulations on the DOJ special counsel would be constitutional. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:58 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Bob Bauer replied to Rick Pildes’ August 3 argument that a judicially enforceable codification of regulations on the DOJ special counsel would be constitutional. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Bob Bauer
My colleague Rick Pildes has made a thoughtful, well-crafted case for the constitutionality of a judicially enforceable codification of the DOJ special counsel regulations. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am by Michel Paradis
” Later, Rick Pildes offered a more favorable view of these legislative efforts as mere codifications of safeguards that the Department of Justice had already put in place via regulation. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:26 am by Alex Potcovaru
And Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ special counsel regulations. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Rick Pildes considered whether Congress could simply codify the DOJ Special Counsel regulations. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 10:55 am by JB
Rick Pildes and Darryl Levinson have pointed out that our system is better described as separation of parties rather than separation of powers. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Rick Pildes took issue with Alan Dershowitz’s recent argument that the President has complete control over all federal law-enforcement investigations, even those that impact himself and those around him. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:25 pm
"In the View of the Supreme Court, Alan Dershowitz is Wrong About the Powers of the President": Rick Pildes has this post at "Lawfare. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
” Ruthann Robson analyzes the opinion at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and at the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes and Justin Levitt do the same here and here, respectively. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:26 pm
"Disagreeing With Rick Hasen on the North Carolina Case": Richard Pildes has this post at the "Election Law Blog. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Amy Howe (description of the case) Rick Pildes Ezra Rosenberg and Kristen Clarke (and more coming)   … Continue reading → [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:44 am by Justin Levitt
Rick Hasen and Rick Pildes have already weighed in on the NC redistricting case this morning. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes looks at the issues at stake in the court’s second major racial redistricting case this term, Cooper v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 6:59 am by Rick Hasen
The cert petition (signed by Bob Bauer, Rick Pildes, John … Continue reading → [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:26 pm by Andrew Hamm
Commentary on the future of the court comes from Rick Hasen for Los Angeles Times, who suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts may become the court’s new swing vote, and Matt Ford for The Atlantic. [read post]