Search for: "Sackett v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 41 - 60
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which instructed the Sacketts to stop work because of the presence of wetlands protected by the CWA, which bars the discharge of pollutants, including rocks and sand, into “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
Environmental Protection Agency II The Sacketts continued their fight against the EPA in Sackett v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has heard a case known as Sackett v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:05 pm
[1] Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
In Sackett v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:49 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, Sackett v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
EPA) and the Environmental Protection Agency's ongoing rule makings. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:07 am
Delivering a decision in Sackett v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 566 U.S. ___, No. 10-1062 (Mar. 12, 2012). [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
After learning of this plan and subsequent discussions with the Sacketts, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded that the land was wetlands subject to protection under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and issued a Compliance Order to the Sacketts. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, a case in which the Court is asked (once again) to clarify the scope of federal regulatory authority over wetlands under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:57 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) argues that the court should uphold the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s significant-nexus test. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
The ruling was a setback for the Environmental Protection Agency and a victory for an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett, who have been battling with the federal government for over 15 years in their efforts to build a house on an empty lot near a large lake. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:00 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
Environmental Protection Agency et al. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 am
Environmental Protection Agency that their property contained "wetlands" under the Clean Water Act, Sackett v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:01 am
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
