Search for: "Saucier v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2009, 2:13 am
CallahanCIVIL RIGHTS - SECTION 1983 - IMMUNITY"The two-step sequence set forth in Saucier v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
Callahan- 9-0, giving district courts discretion to disregard Saucier v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
  The mandatory sequence was laid down in Saucier v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
  With the continued viability of Saucier hanging in the balance in Pearson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
There is, in addition, a procedural issue that may prevent the Court from reaching the merits: whether to overrule Saucier v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Callahan (07-751), on whether police officers were entitled to qualified immunity for conducting a warrantless search based on the signal of an undercover informant who had previously entered the home, and whether the Court should overrule its decision in Saucier v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Sarausad (07-772), on whether, during habeas review, federal courts must accept state court determinations that jury instructions correctly explain state law regarding accomplice liability; and Hedgpeth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
The Court also directed the parties to address the issue of whether Saucier v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Wilson's due process state-endangerment claims (except against appellee Armitage), and would leave to the district court to address in the first instance appellees' defenses of immunity, see, e.g., Saucier v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:23 pm
  In granting review, the Court asked the lawyers to argue whether it should overrule its 2001 decision in Saucier v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:50 am
Thomas Colby has posted an article titled "Clearing the Smoke from Philip Morris v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:20 am
Via Scotusblog, he United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in two cases: United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
. __________________ Docket: 07-608 Case name: United States v. [read post]