Search for: "Sears v. Rule"
Results 41 - 60
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am
Sherita Sears submitted a claim for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §205-a, claim predicated on an alleged violation of Labor Law §27-a,The Appellate Division ruled that the plaintiff in this action, Sherita Sears, was not entitled to recover under GML §205-a,*as the injuries Jamel Sears had sustained while participating in FST exercises were not the type of occupational injury that Labor Law §27-a** was designed to address. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:52 pm
Sears, N.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 5:56 am
In Norris v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:35 am
Accordingly, in Forchion v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:40 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. (2012) (2013) And so it is noteworthy that, despite his ruling in Sears, he has also authored the opinion in Parko v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:19 am
Mississippi's caps on non-economic damages were upheld as a result of Thursday's decision in Sears v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:15 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., No. 10-2407, slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Sproat in Covelli v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:33 am
Berbig v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:42 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:24 am
(See Salsman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 5:54 pm
Today, in Moody v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:07 am
The restrictive approach in Cuthbert v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:50 am
The Supreme Court struck a blow against insurance companies and in favor of workers with its ruling in the case of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
Thorogood v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:51 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
Footnote 7 from the Mississippi Supreme Court's non-decision in Sears v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:07 am
See Thorogood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:01 am
" Oplus Technologies, Ltd. v. [read post]
