Search for: "Sierra Club v. US Fish and Wildlife Service"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a final environmental impact assessment for its proposed rule that would reinterpret the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 to prohibit only the intentional killing of birds. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
– Environmental Protection, February 26, 2010 United Parcel Service has agreed to pay a $53,931 civil penalty to U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Ministerial/Discretionary Distinction The First District helpfully elaborated on CEQA’s “functional test” for determining whether an agency’s project approval action is ministerial, rather than discretionary, in nature and therefore not subject to CEQA in Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
Further, addressing the legal issue whether the drought discussion was adequate under the requirement that it “sufficiently performs the function of facilitating ‘informed agency decision making and informed public participation’” (see Sierra Club v. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
Transportation Impacts and New VMT Methodology – In perhaps the most significant substantive change to the Guidelines, the Final Text adopts an alternative methodology for analyzing the significance of transportation impacts.[17] The Agency determined that the current level of service (“LOS”) methodology, which analyzes traffic congestion, tends to promote increased vehicle use, jeopardizing the ability to realize GHG emissions reduction goals. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Draper Energy, which owned the Snack Corner Mobil Station, and Energy North Inc., which operated the service station, failed to put in place a spill prevention plan and illegally discharged diesel fuel, according to a Complaint that had been filed by EPA’s New England office in September 2009. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, December 2, 2009 The Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service did not violate either the Marine Mammals Protection Act or the National Environmental Policy Act when it issued its regulations that allow the incidental “take” of marine animals. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The settlement which also resolves lawsuits brought by the Sierra Club, Hawaii’s Thousand Friends and Our Children’s Earth Foundation, includes a comprehensive compliance schedule for the city to upgrade its wastewater collection system by June 2020. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
After reacting with water, the chemical can damage fish gills and other organisms by inhibiting their ability to absorb oxygen. [read post]
