Search for: "Sinclair v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm
See “Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:00 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 11:14 pm
Sinclair Refining Company v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Direct Command --Constitution of the United States Article I, V --Notes and Questions --b. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:51 am
It nearly destroyed her. * United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless conduct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:56 pm
The recently decided New Jersey Supreme Court decision of State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
Sinclair, DVM1; Ryan M. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet ALDF v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Almost two decades ago, I learned several lessons as a Congressional lawyer, some more useful than others. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
See also United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 28.3(b) (Citation Form; Certification) (Aug. 1, 2011) (“For each legal proposition supported by citations in the argument, counsel must cite to any opposing authority if such authority is binding on this court, e.g., U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
Supreme Court case (Sinclair v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:33 pm
United States. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
What is not in doubt is that technology will surely continue to press the capability and intent behind the Constitution of the United States. [read post]