Search for: "Spivak v Spivak" Results 41 - 53 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2013, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Rights work has often been fiercely criticized for its replication of the posture of “white men saving brown women from brown men’, as Gyatri Spivak famously phrased it. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm by Scott A. McKeown
Last week, this trend continued in the case of Xerox Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:59 am by Jenna Greene
" Eric Schweibenz, a partner at Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustad, shared Sobin's assessment. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm by admin
District Court of Connecticut, Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm by admin
District Court of Connecticut, Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Corp., 283 AD2d 128 [2d Dept 2001]), or “invalid” (Stile v Antico, 272 AD2d 403 [2d Dept 2000]). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:57 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
These competing rules of law were at play in a recent appeals court decision in a particularly nasty father-son litigation over a donut franchise empire, Burns v C.R.B. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Liberty is not “I do what I want”; grown up understanding is ordered liberty, reconciling competing claims/rights, and that’s what property/copyright does.Palmer: Rivalrous v. nonrivalrous: good reason to have property, because it avoids conflict over rivalry. [read post]