Search for: "Staples v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 10:45 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman represents defendants charged with crimes in the New Jersey Superior Court, all New Jersey municipal courts, The New York State criminal courts in Manhattan and Brooklyn, and the United States District Courts in New Jersey and New York City. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:39 am
§ 271, including as follows:   (a) by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling in the United States or importing into the United States computer software and/or hardware and/or systems, and/or by engaging in or practicing in the United States methods or processes covered by the Patents-in-Suit, including such methods or processes which utilize one or more of the Accused Products [those products of Interactive which are claimed to… [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:07 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm by Jason Rantanen
” Procedural History: At trial, the jury was instructed to consider liability for all “United States sales,” which included “all kits made, used, offered for sale, sold within the United States or imported in the United States as well as kits made outside the United States where a substantial portion of the components are supplied from the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:41 am by Jo Dale Carothers
§271(f)(2), specifically “addresses the act of exporting components that are specially adapted for an invention,” stating “[w]hoever without authority supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States any component of a patented invention that is especially made or especially adapted for use in the invention and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use, where such component is… [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by royblack
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 8:56 am by paperstreet
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 pm by Harvard Law Review
Criminal Law - Supervised Release - Third Circuit Approves Decade-Long Internet Ban for Sex Offender - United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Leon Friedman
  His persistence would change the face of criminal justice in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:14 am by Geraldine Davila Gonzalez
On September 29, 2020, in the case of Bookfinders Ltd v The Revenue Commissioners, the Irish Supreme Court held, among other issues, that the bread used in Subway sandwiches did not fall within the definition of bread as a staple food under Irish tax laws due to a high percentage of sugar and fat in the ingredients and was thus not subject to the zero percent tax rate. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
  My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]