Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 41 - 60 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
In re Starbucks Corporation, Serial Nos. 85792872 (left) and 86689423 (right) (January 17, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Whether or not someone might use cryptocurrency to, say, buy a cup of coffee at Starbuck’s, Ohio residents, at least, may now use bitcoin to pay their state taxes. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:15 am by Tom Smith
And Starbucks has promoted fair trade coffee, marriage equality and racial justice more or less successfully. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:09 pm by Joel A. Webber
Only 25% of corporate legal buyers said they would recommend their ‘go-to’ law firm. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:19 am
A few years ago, hedge fund Pershing Square—which popped up on Oct. 9 with a 1.1 percent stake in coffee company Starbucks—went after retailer J.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:04 pm by Cyrus Farivar
In 2012, a British parliamentary committee chided executives from Amazon, Google, and even Starbucks for employing such tactics. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am by Richard Hunt
We aren’t quite to Halloween, but the candy is certainly crowding the shelves of local stores, whose owners might want to take a look at Ryan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
Amplify Federal Credit Union , Opposition No. 91228233 [Section 2(d) priority contest involving two applicants seeking to register the mark AMPLIFY, in standard character form, for charitable fundraising services].October 30, 2018 - 10 AM: In re Starbucks Corporation, Serial No. 85792872 [Refusal to register an alleged mark consisting of a green circle placed centrally on the front exterior side of a white cup, for "Coffee, tea, coffee and tea based beverages, and cocoa;… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Claire Kalia
” In fact, the Court sharply noted that what a large corporation like Starbucks considered de minimis “is not de minimis at all to many ordinary people who work for hourly wages. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Probably less generally known is that Cranor was one of the founders of an organization, the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT), which recently was the complaining party in a California case in which CERT sought money damages for Starbucks’ failure to label each cup of coffee sold as known to the State of California as causing cancer.6 Having a so-called not-for-profit corporation can also be pretty handy, especially when it holds itself out as a scientific… [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:53 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Starbucks Corporation, ostensibly clarifying the application of the widely adopted de minimis doctrine to California’s wage-hour laws. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 7:12 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
“People” refers to any and all of us — consumers, small business people, executive directors, corporate executives and in-house counsel. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 6:34 am by Nassiri Law
Starbucks Corp., July 26, 2018, Supreme Court of California More Blog Entries: L’Oreal Accused of Wage and Hour Violations, April 5, 2018, L.A. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
In case you missed the in-depth coverage of Employment Law Daily for July, here’s a recap of some key developments in the L&E community. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:05 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Human first, then Technology Dan Wright, who leads Osborne Clarke Solutions and is a former corporate lawyer, agreed with all of the above, and had a few other essential points that he distilled into a bulleted list. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 3:08 pm by Juvan Bonni
Park & Associates, PLC RPX Corporation SBMC Guntin & Gust    [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:54 am by Matthew I. Bobb
Starbucks Corporation, the California Supreme Court held that California wage and hour laws have not adopted the FLSA’s de minimis doctrine. [read post]