Search for: "State v. Alford" Results 41 - 60 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2019, 5:59 am by Cody Bassham
ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD; WALTER “BRUCE” ALFORD; KYLE BALTZ; RUSSELL BLACK; RUSSELL BRAGG; ROBERT CAMPBELL; DR.... [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:24 pm by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford That’s the question that a Ninth Circuit en banc panel heard yesterday in Movesian v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:03 pm
by Roger Alford One of the remarkable differences between the Obama Administration and the Bush Administration in terms of international litigation is the utter silence of this State Department in filing amicus briefs and/or statements of interest. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:37 pm by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford Kudos to Chris Whytock for a wonderful conference yesterday at UC Irvine addressing the topic of human rights litigation in state courts and under state law. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:18 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] that state child protective services workers Bob Camreta and James Alford were entitled to qualified immunity on... [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:52 am by Roger Alford
From Roger Alford’s post: While there are legitimate concerns about a nascent global administrative state, one should recognize that treaties are rarely a threat to national sovereignty. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:24 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford Yesterday voters in Oklahoma voted overwhelmingly (70% in favor to 30% against) to ban the use of international law and Sharia law in state courts. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:33 pm by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford Last month the Second Circuit issued a remarkable ruling that threatens to upend the longstanding rule of successor state liability for the credit obligations of predecessor states. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:54 pm by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford Donald “Trey” Childress has the scoop: Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mammoth en banc opinion in the case of Sarei v. [read post]