Search for: "State v. Atkins" Results 41 - 60 of 676
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2023, 8:30 am by Gene Takagi
Brennen: Race Conscious Affirmative Action by Tax Exempt 501(c)(3) Institutions After Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 8:32 am by Alan Brackett
In 2020, the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (“WCAB”) in Atkins v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
Musk has threatened to sue Media Matters, who reported the antisemitic content they found on X and have stated that they would defend any litigation. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
I arrived at the SEC in October 2006 to serve as counsel to Commissioner Paul Atkins. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm by Kalvis Golde
Texas mandate that courts deem the standard of “significantly subaverage intellectual functioning” for determining intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But was Dobbs more significant than the Court's 2002 decision in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[38] As then-Commissioner Paul Atkins once said, “[W]e must be vigilant that the shareholder proposal process does not result in the tyranny of the minority. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm by Amy Howe
Nine years after Brown’s trial, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Anderson sat down with professors Chimène Keitner and Ingrid Wuerth to discuss oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
”[2]For Marxist-Leninist and many post-colonial states, it is described as “Building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind and Global Human Rights Governance. [read post]