Search for: "State v. Farley"
Results 41 - 60
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States to Gill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
The state court agreed, and when the case was removed to federal district court (because the parties are citizens of different states), the federal court inherited the seal. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
In an op-ed for The Guardian, Najah Farley argues that a ruling in favor of the employers in Epic Systems v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:11 am
Similarly, the New York seminal case is Mauro v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
Farley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
Did the Tam Court gloss over the language in Walker v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:57 pm
PeerJ Preprints 5:e3100v1 doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100v1 , peerj.com/preprints/3100v1/ Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, Haustein S. (2017) The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:01 am
Weis Markets 379 Farley v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
For instance, the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
In Matal v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am
I was speaking to a thoughtful, insightful person last night who asked me, “What if Simon Tam wins in Lee v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
In my humble opinion, the Law Professors Amicus Curiae brief filed on November 6, 2016, by Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University Washington College of Law and Professor Rebecca Tushnet of Georgetown University Law Center, make this and other points quite well. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Farley: they do reject all SHIT marks.Rettew: Madonna for wines was once considered scandalous. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:05 am
But Marietta and Farley found that two-thirds of the time the Court simply states or assumes a social fact as if it were the undisputed truth, without citation to an expert or other source. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Apple Computer v. [read post]
