Search for: "State v. Lujan" Results 41 - 60 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
" Id. at 122.To establish standing, CREW claims to have suffered the requisite injury in fact, see Lujan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:07 am
The court’s analysis of the Gap’s objection to standing focused on the first element of the Lujan test (Lujan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Ostrer had standing in this case, because only he met the three requirements for standing outlined in Lujan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Significantly, the Court was careful to note that pleading the requisite degree of “injury” for purposes of Prop 64 standing is not onerous:We also relied on the United States Supreme Court's description of "injury in fact" for federal court standing purposes as " 'an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized . . . and (b) "actual or imminent, not 'conjectural' or 'hypothetical,' "… [read post]