Search for: "State v. Matthews" Results 41 - 60 of 3,556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:49 am by Unreported Opinions
STATE OF MARYLAND appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Matthew, Mary and Erica declined to accept vaccination on grounds that the vaccines had been developed through use of fetal stem cells, which was a violation of their respective faiths. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Matthew, Mary and Erica declined to accept vaccination on grounds that the vaccines had been developed through use of fetal stem cells, which was a violation of their respective faiths. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
” The challengers filed their lawsuit in Amarillo, Tex., where it was all but certain to be heard by Matthew Kacsmaryk, a conservative federal jurist there who, before becoming a judge, had written articles criticizing the court’s landmark decision in Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The claim concerns a tweet published by Matthew Hancock MP last January which accused the claimant, Andrew Bridgen MP, of promoting an anti-Semitic, anti-vax theory. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]