Search for: "State v. Rupe" Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post, we had provided a descriptive comment of the decision of the Supreme Court in MP Rural Road Development Authority v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Sections 35 and 35A have been considered recently by this Court in Salem Advocates Bar Association v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am by admin
   “This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:10 am by Old Fox
”What made the skewed ratio possible is the availability of amniocentesis in the mid-1970s, and later ultrasound, to determine the gender of a child before birth.Last cites an ad put out by an Indian clinic that states, “Better 500 rupees now than 5,000 later,” referring to the price of a sex-determination test versus the cost of a dowry for a daughter.Skewed sex ratios have had some unpleasant and often violent repercussions through history, Hvistendahl points… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:54 am by The Legal Blog
 Dikshit has demanded a token Re 1 as damages in her suit before the court of Justice V K Jain. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 10:58 am by The Legal Blog
 In all such suits the plaintiff shall state the amount at which he values the relief sought: Provided that minimum court-fee in each shall be thirteen rupees. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:12 am by Abhinav Chandrachud
On October 20, 2010 the Delhi High Court in Pooja Saxena v. [read post]