Search for: "State v. Square" Results 41 - 60 of 4,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2014, 4:35 pm
Searchers covered 64 square miles over 10 hours. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:47 pm by immigrationprof
City Square of the Fordham Urban Law Journal features a give-and-take between Professors Victor Romero (Penn State) and Won Kidane (Seattle) about Professor Romero's article Decriminalizing Border Crossings, 38 Fordham Urb. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:27 pm by Zachary Spilman
Tuesday’s oral argument before CAAF in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:19 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Olympic Airlines SA Pension & Life Insurance Scheme v Olympic Airlines SA [2013] EWCA Civ 643 (06 June 2013) Lumos Skincare Ltd v Sweet Squared Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 590 (06 June 2013) High Court (Administrative Court) Kola, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 1434 (Admin) (06 June 2013) Aslam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:04 pm by Steve Lash
Attorneys for the U.S. government and Maryland squared off last week at the Supreme Court over whether the Constitution permits the state to collect taxes from the congressionally chartered national bank without its consent. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
Here is the abstract: On June 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:30 am by Shari Shapiro
One path for compliance with the Washington State Energy Code is to build a house less than 1500 square feet.  [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 2:50 am by Walter Olson
Last Wednesday I had the pleasure of appearing at the Intelligence Squared debate series before a New York audience on the topic: “Call a Convention to Amend the Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am by Heather K. Gerken
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:52 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
Justice Scalia concluded that this case squarely met those requirements. [read post]