Search for: "State Farm v. INSURANCE DEPT."
Results 41 - 60
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co., 91 NY2d at 653; Soto v State Farm Ins. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
[Guarino], 11 AD3d 909, 911; Medina v State Farm Mut. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 8:24 pm
Co., 239 AD2d 486, 487 [2d Dept 1997]; Kula v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:53 am
P.C. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:34 am
Dawson Farms v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:08 am
Co. v Burke, 63 AD3d 732, 733; State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 6:06 pm
Co., 247 NY 176, 184; Mazzocki v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
Co. v Russell, 50 AD3d 1611 (4th Dept. 2008). [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:33 am
We reject the further contention of Giacometti and State Farm Insurance Company, a defendant in appeal No. 1 (State Farm), that any use of a vehicle is with permission of the owner pursuant to the presumption in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 (1). [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:24 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
"Inasmuch as an insurer is not required to pay or deny a claim until it receives verification of all relevant requested information (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.8[b][3]; Nyack Hosp. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
Co. v Ballinger, 303 AD2d 503, 504; see Insurance Law § 5217; State Farm Mut. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 7:56 am
Co. v Constantino, 49 AD3d 736, 737; Matter of State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 6:51 am
Co. v Marshall, 12 AD3d 508; State Farm Mut. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
Rekemeyer v State Farm Mut. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:01 am
Co., 29 AD3d at 548; Matter of State Farm Mut. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:32 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 6:57 am
Where timely notice of the original accident had been given, the claimant's delay of nearly 35 months in notifying Nationwide of her SUM claim was not enough without a showing of prejudice to deny SUM coverage based on late notice of the SUM claim: "[W]here an insured previously gives timely notice of the accident, the carrier must establish that it is prejudiced by a late notice of SUM claim before it may properly disclaim coverage" (Rekemeyer v… [read post]