Search for: "State of New York v. United States Department of Labor et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 11:41 am
Alcoa, Inc. et al., New York Supreme Court (Onondaga County) Index No. 2010-1098 (Oct. 1, 2012). [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 10:26 pm
So far, ten deaths have been reported, including one in Illinois, one in New Jersey, one in New York, one in Virginia, one in Florida, one in Tennessee, one in New Mexico, one in New York, and two in South Carolina. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Harvey et al.Amicus brief of Gerald Sherwin et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Evanson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
" Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (10th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionRespondents' supplemental briefPetitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the National Congress of American IndiansPetitioner's replyCVSG Information:Invited: February 22, 2011Filed: May 27, 2011 (Deny) Title: City of New York v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDocket: 10-605Issue(s): Whether, under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act, the government must analyze all of the economic impacts of a “critical habitat” designation (regardless of whether the impacts are co-extensive with, or cumulative of, other causes), or instead only those impacts for which “critical habitat” designation is a “but for” cause.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th… [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
§§ 1481 and 1484, which require true and accurate information on invoices and entry documents.Government lawyers allege in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 7:03 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
With regard to its neighbors, only New Hampshire has a better overall Index ranking than Massachusetts.[2] The individual income tax, in particular, is the cornerstone of Massachusetts’ tax competitiveness, reducing the cost of employment in the Commonwealth and increasing the return to labor. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
HOWARD SAFIR, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, et al., 99 F. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Federal Republic of Germany, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
National Labor Relations Board, a case concerning an injunction against union picketing, and in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
New York, 10-1404, and Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. [read post]
