Search for: "State of Texas v. EPA"
Results 41 - 60
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Texas’ Solicitor General argued first. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
The so-called Transport Rule, also known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, had sought to define emissions reduction responsibilities for Texas and 27 eastern states based on those states’ contributions to downwind states’ air quality problems. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 1:55 pm
By James V. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:40 pm
Texas and other state governments, for instance, argued that the EPA “coerced” them by imposing more onerous regulations on private industry in located in states where the state governments do not submit an implementation plan controlling greenhouse gases. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:06 pm
Every state but Texas is ready to issue pollution permits for big new sources. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:26 pm
v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm
Gibbs v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:58 am
See Texas v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court, on April 29, 2014, reversed the DC Circuit in EPA v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:45 am
Posted by Charles Sartain USA v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:47 pm
Texas.) [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
EPA, Texas Water Development Board v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:51 am
After my post on judicial restraint – and the lack thereof – in Texas v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Texas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:09 pm
These rules purport to increase the EPA's jurisdiction under the auspice of both the statutory language of the Act and federal case law, such as the Rapanos v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:24 am
When the Biden Administration ramped up fuel efficiency requirements through 2026, ideologues such as the Heartland Institute and states like Texas were quick to wheel out this attack. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 7:39 am
The case, Air Alliance Houston v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v EPA, announced on May 25, 2023, was unanimous in that the EPA’s wetlands regulatory jurisdiction is limited to wetlands with a continuous surface connection to the waters of the United States. [read post]
