Search for: "State v. Ashland"
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:52 pm
” In the case -- Son v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:29 pm
Bunning had issued the order to implement the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
USA Eastern District of Kentucky at Ashland 08a0620n.06 Herrera Flores v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Medlin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:06 am
For a breach of contract case where a plaintiff's argument for a contract implied in fact did not succeed, take a look at Ferguson v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Cir. 1984), which awarded children surviving a plane crash medical monitoring to diagnose future impact-related injuries, and the state’s Doe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
Objecting to producing certain documents demanded pursuant to a non-judicial subpoena duces tecumNew York State Joint Commission. on Public Ethics v Campaign for One N.Y., Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 26290, Supreme Court, Albany County, Denise A. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:11 pm
Strode v City of Ashland, 295 Neb. 44 (NE 10/28/2016) Filed under: Current Caselaw, Uncategorized [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:06 pm
The second case on appeal is the Electronic Frontier Foundation's case against AT&T, known as Hepting v. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 9:32 am
” Kensington Assocs. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 9:32 am
” Kensington Assocs. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 2:15 pm
Ashland Oil, 508 F. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
The judgment was upheld on appeal in 2008, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:19 pm
[2] City of Ashland v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Ashland Chem. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
As the court stated in McClain:[A]nother methodological problem undermines [the expert's] analogical approach. . . . [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
This second appeal–United States v. [read post]
