Search for: "State v. Automatic Merchandisers" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am by Larry
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding the facts here quite similar to the plaintiffs in Estrada v FedEx Ground Package Sys, in which a state appeals court held drivers were employees under state law, the Ninth Circuit reinstated the drivers’ state-law causes of action alleging failure to pay sick leave and other wage-related claims (Ruiz v Affinity Logistics Corp, June 16, 2014, Pregerson, H). [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:25 pm
Morris filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against artist Elizabeth Peyton and retailer Target for unauthorized use of the photographs in creating derivative artwork reproduced on merchandise sold throughout the United States. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:13 am by Larry
In a 1927 decision called United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If the P shows D used too much, does it automatically win on likely confusion? [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
A.V.E.L.A. and The Re-Emergence of Aesthetic Functionality in Trademark Merchandising Cases  By: Tracy Reilly This article analyzes the original Ninth Circuit opinion in Fleisher Studios, Inc. v. [read post]