Search for: "State v. Davey"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2007, 4:19 pm
Davey, upholding a state law that barred state scholarships to students studying for the clergy. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:19 pm
Davey, upholding a state law that barred state scholarships to students studying for the clergy. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
Davey v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:06 pm
Van Wagner Boston, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:29 am
It compared the case to Locke v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am
Davey that the scholarship funds were denied because of the religious use they would be put to. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:59 am
Comer and Espinoza v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:51 am
Davey, 2012 SCC 75 (CanLII) at para 51, citing R. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
Davey into Florida constitutional law. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen weighs in on Lomax v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:45 am
According to the 6th Circuit in Wheat v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
This is a journalistic account of a moot court of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 10:03 am
Davey is abrogated. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
The state points to the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Locke v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
Jason Baker Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0623n.06 Rene Davey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:03 pm
Davey. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
And, in Locke v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:32 am
Jacobsen v Katzer, now settled), or the EULA issues raised in MDY v Blizzard and the issues highlighted through Amazon’s Orwellian mess. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious purpose, and (v) does not… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
Davey in the Establishment Clause context: states are permitted to fund constitutional rights, but do not have to. [read post]
