Search for: "State v. Hinojosa"
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am
Hinojosa passed legislation on the topic giving public defenders preference. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
Hinojosa 15-833Issue: (1) Whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s presumption that a state decision rejecting a claim is a ruling on the merits can be rebutted by looking through to an earlier state ruling which applied a procedural bar that, under state law, could not be the basis for the later decision; and (2) whether, if so, a change in state law reducing a prisoner’s ability to earn future good-time credits based on… [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
Hinojosa (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 57, 65-66.) [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am
Hinojosa 15-833Issue: (1) Whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s presumption that a state decision rejecting a claim is a ruling on the merits can be rebutted by looking through to an earlier state ruling which applied a procedural bar that, under state law, could not be the basis for the later decision; and (2) whether, if so, a change in state law reducing a prisoner’s ability to earn future good-time credits based on… [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:44 pm
And though State Sen. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:44 pm
” Brown v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Hinojosa, 15-833, is a state-on-top habeas case that implicates a recurring difficulty that courts have applying the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s presumption that a state decision rejecting a claim is a ruling on the merits. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
This legislation seems premature to me - a half-cocked, git-tuff response to a lingering social conflict between church and state. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:57 pm
” See Kernan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
State Rep. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
(That’s the central point of Miller v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
Hinojosa, 15-883, gets that honor this week after four relists. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am
Discusssion with staff reflected that there had been some shortage and that one dorm lost both the JCO V and VI" (which are supervisory positions)." [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 3:21 am
MexicoPetitioner v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:19 am
Juan "Chuy" Hinojosa and Rep. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:31 am
State Rep. [read post]
